Wednesday, November 26, 2008
The Templar
Steve Berry made a novel inspired by the Knights Templar entitled The Templar Legacy.
In the novel, Raymond de Roquefort has been planning a revolt. Set in the modern context, the brothers are now living in secrecy. As a member of the Order, he seeks to change this lifestyle. One of his hidden agendas is to revenge the persecution the order has undergone.
Raymond de Roquefort's character interests me. As the reader who is able to see the whole picture of the story, I portray him as the antagonist. He killed and tortured innocent people for the sake of his planned revolt. However, if I were a member of the order, i would probably see him as the hero. That's because he gives an excellent speech that appealed to the emotions. He knew what made his brothers tick. And he used their wants and needs to gain control over the order.
Yes, his intentions could be considered positive, but his ways are wrong. To gain support from his fellow brothers, he didn't dwell on the specifics. He pressed on the outcomes and his goals impressed the members.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Magic could be learned
This innate capability of Hitler to influence people is called charisma. He used charisma to govern Germany. He used charisma to persuade people into war and sacrifice their lives. That's too much power that not just I, but most people envy.
According to Tom Geoghegan of BBC News Magazine, Charis means "grace" or "gift" in Greek. He also brought the good news that people like me who dreams of even just a tint of charisma do not have to worry anymore.
A study, led by Richard Wiseman, suggest that charisma is 50% innate and 50% learned.
"When you see someone else who has charisma, without realizing it, you're mimicking their posture and their facial expressions," says Professor Wiseman, a psychologist. "An obvious example is when someone smiles at you and you smile back. And how you hold yourself influences your emotions."
So, how to be charismatic?
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
campaigns
In a campaign, multiple interpretations by its audience would make the campaign a failure.
Take sea campaign add by Haribon for example.
The organization’s goal was to advocate and encourage people to save the seas. It starts with a frame the shows a ruined coral reef. The text “where have all the fish gone?” was flashed amidst the emptiness of the reef. It was followed by a drawing of a school of fish swimming around. The frame turned to black and the message “call Haribon Foundation” was projected.
So as a viewer of the ad, the first thought that came to me was the question what would happen if I call? After calling, that would be the time I’d know? For the question “where have all the fish gone?” I could say probably fishermen used dynamites or some other form of corruption of natural resources. There were a lot of questions in my mind. The only thing that’s clear is that the ad wanted to infuse pity in me. That part I wouldn’t know if I haven’t seen other campaigns.
Campaigns need to deliver specific information or else its audience would be confused. They would give different interpretations and the goal of the organization wouldn’t be fulfilled if people would do different things.